For many years Samuel Phillips Law Firm has retained a strong and successful working relationship with...
Samuel Phillips Law Firm's family law department is widely recognised as one of the leading teams of experts in Newcastle.
Starting or growing a business can give the owners an enormous sense of pride and satisfaction.
Samuel Phillips Law Firm can count a number of north east educational establishments as regular clients. From this experience we understand the language and priorities of the education sector and can therefore deliver bespoke solutions that precisely meet the needs of the organisation.
We are very proud to count one of the UK's largest police forces as a long standing client...
Samuel Phillips Law Firm work with a wide range of non profit organisations and support their need to protect their interests...
by September 15, 2015Published on
In this case the claimants worked as technicians for two security installation and maintenance companies. After the companies closed their provincial offices and assigned all employees to the central office in Madrid, they started travelling from their homes in a company car to wherever they were assigned. This could involve distances of more than 100 km.
Before the change, workers started their working day when they arrived at their employer’s premises and finished it when they arrived back there. After the change, the company decided that it should start when they arrived at the premises of the first customer and finish when they left the premises of the last customer, arguing that any other time constituted a “rest period”.
Noting that Tyco had previously regarded the journeys at the beginning and the end of the day to and from customers as working time, the Court held that time spent travelling between home and their customers was still working time after the closure of the central office. All that had changed was the departure point. The workers were also at their employer’s disposal when driving to the first customer as they were legally obliged to do what their employer instructed them to do.
It followed therefore that the time these workers spent travelling each day between their homes and the premises of the first and last customers designated by their employer constituted “working time”.
This decision will inevitably lead to an increase in costs for employers whose workers are in a similar situation. They should therefore seek advice as soon as possible from specialist employment solicitors in order to ensure that they are complying with their obligations both under the directive as a result of this decision and national law in terms of the rate of pay for the journey time between home and customers.
April 12, 2017
In the midst of all the talk about the increase in Probate application fees, the Office of the Public Guardian (‘the OPG’) has decided to go against the grain with the welcome result of reducing fees. As of 1 April 2017, the OPG is reducing the registration fee for a Lasting Power of Attorney (‘LPA’) […]
October 28, 2016
The recent ruling in favour of two taxi drivers could have far reaching consequences for the UK’s rapidly expanding “gig economy”. The Employment Tribunal delivered its decision Friday 28th October setting out that Uber, a business whose success is largely due to customers use of their smartphone app and engagement of self employed drivers; should […]